On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote: > > On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski <beleg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding > >> build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer > >> perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever. > >> Not to mention being quite wasteful from the resources perspective as > >> mame builds take quite a while. > >> While not much can be done now, can we make sure that the mass rebuild > >> builds do not get garbage collected, or at least the build logs are > >> saved somewhere? Thanks. > > > > As far as I know, at least some form of truncated build.log used to > > get attached when FTBFS bugs were filed after a mass rebuild ... maybe > > this time this wasn't possible, because bugs were reported *weeks* > > after the mass rebuild? > > > > And I agree, having no logs at all for something that takes a long > > time to build is annoying :( > > Well, if your package is tracked by koschei (which I highly recommend), > you likely could get a current build log from there.
True, but that doesn't help if the failure occurred on s390x or i686, which aren't tracked in koschei. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
