If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed: Removing dependent packages: ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.2 M libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 9.6 M libavdevice-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 228 k libavfilter-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 4.4 M libavformat-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.6 M libavutil-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 836 k libpostproc-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 127 k libswresample-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 152 k libswscale-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 632 k
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 > - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided > by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 > - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - conflicting requests > Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 > - conflicting requests > - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free > provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 > - package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free > provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 > - problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 > - libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting > packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: >> > > > - problem with installed package >> msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch >> > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) >> > > >> > > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages. >> > > >> > > >> > It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that >> > package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-* >> > subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the >> > subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of >> the >> > other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib. >> >> I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some >> subset of the subpackages. >> >> Zbyszek >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> > > > -- > *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* > -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue