On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:26:55AM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > Probably each hardware vendor will need to become more involved in > creating an RPM distribution for their use case and providing hardware > for test builds. A single monolithic Fedora will not work. Having a > subset of base packages would be very helpful.
This is the bad outcome IMHO. A 'downstream first' world. ;( But perhaps it's the future that waits us. > Maybe we need a RISC V sig? Like the one thats existed for the last few years? :) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RISC-V kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
