I’ll look into this today. In the meanwhile, can you force the use of node-18?
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 6:34 AM Vladimir Slavik <vsla...@redhat.com> wrote: > We're seeing the same with anaconda webui - any invocation of node leads > to segmentation fault - npm, npx... nothing works. > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:28 AM Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 02.05.23 11:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 16:23, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> >> <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:45 AM Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> >> <ser...@serjux.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:16 PM Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> >> <loganje...@gmail.com> >> >> ... >> >> I found a problem related with yarnpkg rpm, the macro % __find_requires >> finds that yarn scripts uses and needs /usr/bin/node , which is added >> to the requires of rpm [1] and this makes yarnpkg pull nodejs (18) even >> when nodejs20 is installed . >> To avoid this rpm automatic requires, we may add to yarnpkg.spec [2] >> >> [2] >> %global __script_requires %{nil} >> >> [1] >> dnf repoquery yarnpkg --available --requires -q >> /usr/bin/bash >> /usr/bin/node >> /usr/bin/sh >> >> >> I'm not sure what you think is a bug here? Do you think `yarnpkg` >> should use *any* nodejs version that's installed? The whole point of >> the way this is broken down is that we have a default version (18, in >> this case) with the option to install 16 and 20 in parallel, but you >> have to do extra work if you want to *use* those non-default versions >> (such as patching shebang lines). >> >> This is broken again in rawhide: >> >> $ dnf -qy install yarnpkg >> $ ll /usr/bin/node* >> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 Apr 28 00:00 /usr/bin/node -> node-20 >> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 28272 Apr 28 00:00 /usr/bin/node-20 >> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 Mar 21 00:00 /usr/bin/nodejs-yarn -> >> ../lib/node_modules_19/yarn/bin/yarn.js >> >> If yarn should be pinned to a node version, please rebuild yarn when >> there's a major version change. And it would be nice if there's a >> mechanism to detect such a breakage. I.e. a nodejs(abi) version or >> something like that. >> >> AFAICS nodejs is generally broken in rawhide (both nodejs20 and >> nodejs18), i.e. just >> >> $ node >> > <type random chars and press backspace a couple of times> >> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >> gdb: >> >> Thread 3 "node" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff2ffe6c0 (LWP 1565850)] >> 0x00007ffff57db195 in >> v8::internal::compiler::SpecialRPONumberer::ComputeAndInsertSpecialRPO(v8::internal::compiler::BasicBlock*, >> v8::internal::compiler::BasicBlock*) () from /lib64/libnode.so.115 >> >> Sandro >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> > > > -- > Vladimír Slávik <vsla...@redhat.com> > Software Engineer, Platform Engineering > Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue