On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 05. 23 23:40, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:03:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > ...snip... > > > > > > Would that be possible? > > > > I don't think it currently is... but sounds like a reasonable RFE to > > koji to me. > > > > The way koji handles noarch packages is that it builds them on all > > arches, checks to make sure they are all the same and just picks one to > > be the 'output' build. > > This is true for noarch subpackages of arched packages. > > For fully noarch packages, it just builds them on one architecture.
Yep. You are correct, sorry for confusing the issue there. I still think it could be something that koji would let us do. > > I think it would make sense to let us exclude some arch in this case > > (i686). I mean normally you would want it to do all arches or it could > > be completely broken on some, but in this case since we only keep i686 > > around as a multiarch thing, it shouldn't matter. > > > > I guess the only downside I see is that it might be confusing if there's > > someone who manually installs some noarch package on a i686 install and > > it breaks. > > This can still happen today anyway, if the package was built and tested on > different arch or if it doesn't run tests at all. yep. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
