How fun! Thanks for the links and explanation. On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 16:09, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55: > >> As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND > >> LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed? > >> > > > > This is no longer allowed: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis > > Also > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_combined_disjunctive_and_conjunctive_license_expressions > which says: > > """ > The license expression must reflect the disjunctive license choice even if > one > or both of the license identifiers in the OR expression also appear > separately > in the composite license expression. > > ... > > License: (GPL-3.0-or-later OR MPL-1.1) AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT > > Here we repeat GPL-3.0-or-later because for one binary component it > appears as > part of an OR subexpression. That is, OR expressions must be treated as > though > they were a single distinct license. > """ > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
