On 06-05-2023 18:48, Ben Beasley wrote:
I don’t think the PyPI parity rule needs to apply to the base package name,
since this is primarily an application package and thus falls under the general
naming guidelines[1]. You could make a case for renaming the python3-staplelib
subpackage to python3-staple, adding the appropriate Obsoletes[2], and adding
%py_provides python3-staplelib[3].
[1]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_application_naming
[2]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
[3]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_provides_for_importable_modules
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense. Although, I'm still having
a hard time determining what the primary purpose of a package is when it
provides both, an application and a library/module, which can be used by
other Python packages.
-- Sandro
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
