* Daniel P. Berrangé: > Parallel install of different versions of mingw has never been > something we needed to consider. We only need parallel install > the different ABIs, which is handled by the higher level dir > in the path. So from that POV, I don't think mingw particularly > cares what semantics are attached to the 4th path component > 'mingw'. As long as we don't have to change our paths currently > used in Fedora, I think it'd be OK for you to define the 4th > component as the OS version indicator.
Okay, then I'll keep the path layout as we have it today for now. It's toolchain-internal for now anyway, so we can adjust it easily later. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
