On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:13 AM DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Jens-Ulrik Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> writes: > MPB uses BuildRequires to collect all packages that *might* be affected > by your change. It builds all those packages with and without your > change, and lets you know what you broke. In this case, one broke (cjs, > since fixed), ten didn't build before my change anyway[*], and the rest > were OK. So if your package doesn't already FTBFS, you're good. > Okay thanks for the clarification and explanations. (I got now that by "affected packages" you didn't mean "failed":) "after" builds: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4/ Okay I was already aware of all the ghc failures: mostly due to the new sphinx version in Rawhide (which I had already fixed for ghc9.4). So it looks fine from my pov so far, thanks. I have just now pushed fixes for all ghc*, so can you try to rebuild them again in your repo? Jens
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
