Il 27/05/23 11:56, Peter Oliver ha scritto: > > If we’re going to recommend migration to anything, shouldn’t it be enchant2? > Users would be able to configure their preferred spellchecking engine per > language (which I imagine is more important for some languages than others), > and we wouldn’t have to go through this again in the future if we > hypothetically decided that, say, Nuspell should replace Hunspell as our > default spellchecker. > +1 here. If we have to convince upstream to migrate to a different default spellchecker, I think it's better to push enchant2. If it is about having the package maintainer build their package against another spellchecker, hunspell is fine, but drop a note about enchant2 is preferred.
I'd also like to raise attention to what I think is a misleading Change Summary: > Deprecating aspell package because it is no longer > Required/Buildrequired by any package in Fedora. This is clearly not true, as the change is about migrating package to another spellchecker. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
