On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:35 AM Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:28 AM Debarshi Ray via devel > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I wanted to wrap up this sub-thread on-list, after Owen and I chatted > > about it off-list. > > > > I am fine with having the fedora-toolbox OCI images being defined as > > kickstart files in the Fedora infrastructure and built by ImageFactory > > and published as another base image, just like the fedora base image > > currently is. > > Just an FYI, but we're trying to move away from ImageFactory in the > general sense. I'm not sure if/how that will manifest itself in > Fedora, but ImageFactory is pretty terrible for debugging things when > it goes wrong. The options we're looking at elsewhere are Image > Builder, OSBS2, and RHTAP. > If we want to move Fedora images to ImageBuilder, then the right thing to do here is still to merge the toolbox image into fedora-kickstarts and then work on migrating that, rather than have it be a one-off outlier. (*) - Owen (*) Yes, I know Fedora-IOT uses ImageBuilder. but in the context of the main Fedora compose.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
