On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:40:08AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Hi, > > this requires a bit of background, so please bear with me :)
Thanks for all the background... :) ...snip reasonable stuff... I agree that an upstream systemd solution is what we should strive for. > The problem is that Fedora 39 and RHEL 9.3 are fast approaching and, > if we don't do anything about this issue before then, a subset of > libvirt users will see their deployments broken after upgrade. In the > interest of avoiding that, I would prefer to get the libvirt-specific > version of the macros merged as soon as possible, and focus on > upstreaming the work all the way to systemd as a follow-up. Do you have a patch/PR we could look at to show what exactly these macros look like? > Does this plan sound reasonable to the Fedora community? Are there > any serious concerns regarding the approach taken for the macros that > would cause them to be considered a complete no-go? Any scenarios > that I might have missed while implementing them? Not sure, but possibly. :) If for some reason this didn't turn out to be something we wanted to ship, what does the 'manual fix' look like? Complex? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
