>>>>> Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> writes:
> I have found that using something like libfoo.so.X{,.*} in the %files
> directive can be a useful reminder (enforcer) to reduce such surprises
> (that particular glob presumes semantic versioning, and that minor and
> patch level updates do not require rebuilds, but that is true much of
> the time).
In fact, excessively wide globbing here is explicitly discouraged by the
packaging guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_library_files
Looking at the current spec, it uses "%{_libdir}/*.so.*"; had it
followed this guideline, I believe this issue would not have occurred.
- J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
