Dne 22. 08. 23 v 22:55 Richard Fontana napsal(a):
The use of `+` is documented at
https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/SPDX-license-expressions/
(there's probably a more recent version)
<excerpt>
D.3 Simple license expressions
A simple <license-expression> is composed one of the following:
An SPDX License List Short Form Identifier. For example: CDDL-1.0
An SPDX License List Short Form Identifier with a unary "+" operator
suffix to represent the current version of the license or any later
version. For example: CDDL-1.0+
An SPDX user defined license reference:
["DocumentRef-"1*(idstring)":"]"LicenseRef-"1*(idstring)
</excerpt>
I believe CDDL-1.0 is like MPL-2.0 in having a built-in "later versions" clause.
Wow, this is new to me.
Do we want to have generally accepted? Or each case of + license needs to be
evaluated separately?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
