On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:47 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> <asosed...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
> > Long story short:
> > RPM has moved to sequoia,
> > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies,
> > Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit DSA key,
> > Google Chrome was not installable => F38 blocker.
> > Back at the time, it's been hastily "resolved"
> > by relaxing RPM security through crypto-policies
> > just enough to tolerate that Google signature:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878
> > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/merge_requests/129
> >
> > Since then it has been brought to my attention that
> > Google has now added a 4096 bit RSA key
> > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
> > (EB4C 1BFD 4F04 2F6D DDCC EC91 7721 F63B D38B 4796)
> >
> > Because of that, I'd like to revert that RPM policy relaxation
> > https://gitlab.com/redhat-crypto/fedora-crypto-policies/-/commit/a12f7b20638be8f872ad1995c7d2edce41c227b5
> > in (f39) rawhide and align RPM security with the rest of the policy.
> >
> > Thoughts / feedback?
>
> I think it should be done as a system wide change so it can have the
> appropriate review but it seems we're better off than we were.

System-wide or self-contained?
I'm not altering the system-wide default,
I'm removing the exception that was limited to rpm/dnf in scope
to bring them in line with system-wide default;
but rpm/dnf are kinda important.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to