On úterý 24. října 2023 0:31:49 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On pátek 30. prosince 2022 20:01:55 CEST Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > > == Summary == > > Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as > > the default approach. > > Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe > > this approach first. > > Various tools that provide spec file templates are adjusted. > > While on it, could we please make %changelog optional?
Whooops! My INBOX got reordered, and it is obvious it is too late for me :-) sorry for bumping this old thread (I have just been dealing with autospec on multiple levels recently so I thought this thread was also relevant). > Packaging become an automatized task, and maintainers don't pay > attention to %changelog beauty so they simply generate it from git-log > (but I'd claim that git-log != %changelog). Seems that > %changelog become one of the most painful maintainers' headache :) > > What do you think about a static changelog like: > > %changelog > * See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/<PKG>/commits/rawhide > > Aren't we ready to admit (something like) this is enough? > > Pavel > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
