On Mon, 2023-11-13 at 19:28 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 12:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +0000, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have a GitHub Action
> > > (https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794
> > > 978022) that fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when
> > > using the rawhide docker image. I have been trying to keep up with
> > > the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may have missed something about
> > > the current state of affairs/expectations around it working without
> > > issue. I am not sure to whom I should raise this issue, any
> > > suggestions welcome - thanks!
> >
> > Not sure what the specific issue is here, but in general, we
> > recommend
> > against pulling from the Docker registry, as it is not updated very
> > often. It's much better to pull from registry.fedoraproject.org or
> > quay.io , as those are updated with every Rawhide compose.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that https://registry.fedoraproject.org/repo/fedora/tags/ is
> quite outdated (contrary to https://hub.docker.com/_/fedora ).
>
> This is quite bad, if I run
>
> podman run -ti fedora:39
>
> it will get the image from registry.fedoraproject.org (due to
> /etc/containers/registries.conf). The problem is, that this image is
> from August and still points to Rawhide. So the first `dnf upgrade`
> installs fc40 packages, which results in a broken installation.
>
> Workaround:
>
> podman run -ti docker.io/fedora:39
>
> Is this a known issue? Am I doing something wrong? Where would I report
> this?
Neither I nor nirik can reproduce this as described. Note the web UI is
basically just lies / incomplete info; I think it's telling you when
the tag was created, not when the image behind it was last updated.
This is what I get trying to reproduce:
[adamw@xps13a Oneplus 9]$ podman run -ti fedora:39
Resolved "fedora" as an alias
(/etc/containers/registries.conf.d/000-shortnames.conf)
Trying to pull registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:39...
Getting image source signatures
Copying blob 6eb636413202 done |
Copying config ec546109f8 done |
Writing manifest to image destination
[root@ee928f4eb27a /]# dnf update
Fedora 39 - x86_64
31 MB/s | 89 MB 00:02
Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
1.2 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:02
Fedora 39 - x86_64 - Updates
393 kB/s | 12 MB 00:32
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:01 ago on Mon Nov 13 19:00:36 2023.
Dependencies resolved.
=============================================================================================================================================================================================
Package Architecture
Version Repository
Size
=============================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrading:
dnf noarch
4.18.1-1.fc39 updates
508 k
dnf-data noarch
4.18.1-1.fc39 updates
39 k
elfutils-default-yama-scope noarch
0.190-1.fc39 updates
14 k
elfutils-libelf x86_64
0.190-1.fc39 updates
195 k
elfutils-libs x86_64
0.190-1.fc39 updates
260 k
gnupg2 x86_64
2.4.3-4.fc39 updates
2.6 M
python3-dnf noarch
4.18.1-1.fc39 updates
589 k
yum noarch
4.18.1-1.fc39 updates
37 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================================================================================================================================
Upgrade 8 Packages
Total download size: 4.2 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
i.e. it's not a Rawhide image, updating uses F39 repos, and only a
small number of updates is available (indicating the image is recent).
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
