On 06. 12. 23 0:09, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't
building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able
to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this,
and since you've already identified some that don't, IMO they should be
fixed*first*.
I agree in principle.
However, this is not a way we treat other updates/changes in Fedora.
Every year, we let a new GCC version be tossed into rawhide and we deal with
possibly hundreds of FTBFS packages later.
Every week, we let maintainers update their packages while breaking runtime
dependencies and we deal with the breakages later.
This zlib thing seems like a minor thing compared to the two above.
(And it certainly does not need a side tag and a mini mass rebuild.)
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
