On 06.02.24 8:50 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:52 PM Daniel P. Berrangé<berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 05:34:06PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi,
could someone in the mingw team look at mingw-libgsf / libgsf (please
see the bug forwarded below)? If I see right, then the standalone
mingw-libgsf package should be retired as there are mingw builds from
the regular libgsf package, which seems to be regularly updated.
Copying Marc-André who added the mingw sub-RPMs to the native
package.
The mingw-libgsf should have been retired on rawhide, as soon
as the libgsf native had a successful build with mingw packages.
At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide
and f39
Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf package?
I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not
listed as package admin.
Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
