On 14/02/2024 15:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +0000, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7
I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it?
The answer is that I'm wrong about it breaking things, because
koji uses the unpacked spec file to install dependencies not the
requires from the srpm.
However the guidelines whilst not mentioning this case do prohibit
the use of %{_isa} in BRs because it produces incorrect dependencies
in the srpm - the only real difference is that this case give you
a missing dependency rather than a broken one.
I was hoping that people with more experience would comment on the
bug, and they did, so thanks.
The issue we have is that valgrind is simply not a package on RISC-V.
Valgrind requires upstream porting work which is only partially
complete (and IIRC not upstream yet). I don't know any other way to
express this other than using:
As it happens I'm an upstream valgrind developer and yes there
are patches around but they're not merged yet.
I'm not saying I won't take the patch I was just surprised it
was allowed and/or worked and was trying to find out more details
before I did anything.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
