V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:10:34PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> Am Do., 15. Feb. 2024 um 17:06 Uhr schrieb Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com>:
> >
> > V Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:57:10PM +0100, Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I recently switched mupdf to shared libraries. During test builds on
> > > COPR for EPEL I noticed a strange difference to fedora builds which I
> > > can reproduce with koji scratch builds as well (epel9 vs fc39). The
> > > difference is in the automatic provides for the -libs sub package:
> > >
> > > Provides: mupdf-libs = 1.23.10-2.el9 mupdf-libs(x86-64) = 1.23.10-2.el9
> > >
> > > Provides: libmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) mupdf-libs = 1.23.10-2.fc39
> > > mupdf-libs(x86-64) = 1.23.10-2.fc39
> > >
> > > And, of course, packages built against mupdf-devel automatically
> > > require ibmupdf.so.23.10()(64bit) and fail to install on *EL.
> > >
> > > I even tested with `%ldconfig_scriptlets libs`, which makes no difference.
> > >
> > > Both packages have the same file contents including the lib, the
> > > SONAME is `libmupdf.so.23.10`.
> > >
> > Where is the file with libmupdf.so.23.10 SONAME? I remember a discussion 
> > about
> > rpmbuild not to generate provides and requires for a SONAME if the libary is
> > not installed into a standard library path.
> 
> It's in /usr/lib64/ in both cases (x86_64, checked with
> rpmdev-extract). spec part is:
>
Does running a dependency generator for ELF files on that file report the
expected provides? Look at /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/elf.attr content. There
should be a ".../elfdeps --provides" command for generating provides. Take
that command and pass the library file as a possitional argument. An example:

/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides /usr/lib64/libacl.so.1.1.2301
libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0)(64bit)
libacl.so.1(ACL_1.1)(64bit)
libacl.so.1(ACL_1.1)(64bit)
libacl.so.1(ACL_1.2)(64bit)
libacl.so.1(ACL_1.2)(64bit)
libacl.so.1()(64bit)

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to