On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM Michel Lind <sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:53:38PM +0000, Christopher Klooz wrote: > > On 14/02/2024 17.35, Michel Lind wrote: > > > As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list > > > where this tends to get posted, apart from devel? > Thanks Michel for taking the base64 review. I realised a second open package review is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068718 (isocline) - it's a newer dep for pandoc (actually hslua-repl). Was just wondering if there's another place where Haskell packaging is > coordinated. It is a good question... I was trying to do that previously in the Haskell SIG (mailing list and channel), but the traction became so low that I largely gave up with that... other than occasionally begging someone specifically to help with an urgent review. ;-( I can certainly send out such mails there and/or here going forward for more direct awareness. (Not sure if it makes sense to post to Discourse: Haskell library reviews are still a little bit "esoteric" since ghc uses some non-standard linking (ie various warnings appear which tend to discourage/throw less experienced reviewers alas: perhaps they should be spelled out further as exception(s) in the Haskell Packaging policy, so I don't need to keep explaining them). I will be posting more reviews soon: in particular a large bunch of hslua related packages - though I think it is better to roll them out in reverse dependency order. Jens
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
