V Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:33:47AM -0600, Jerry James napsal(a):
> Argh, dang time change.  I meant to remark on that and obviously
> forgot.  Yes, libpkgconf 2.1.0 is not ABI compatible with libpgkconf
> 1.9.5, but the soname was not bumped.  Besides pkgconf itself and
> perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf, the build2 and perl-Alien-pkgconf packages
> may also need rebuilds.

I discovered this issue a week ago. I reported it to the upstream (somebody
already posted the link), rebuilt perl-PkgConfig-LibPkgConf
<https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-54844f16d9> and notified
build2 maintainers <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267058>.
perl-Alien-pkgconf does not need rebuilding because it does not use the shared
library.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to