Kevin Kofler wrote:

>> This is not helpful in the slightest and the tone is not appreciated at
>> all.

> Well, I have been arguing against this exception (exempting prebuilt
> autotools output) from the "no prebuilt blobs" rule for years, and it
> saddens me that something like this had to happen for Fedora to finally
> realize that that exception has always been a bad idea.

> […]

CMIIW, but it would not have made any difference as the
source code had been shipped as part of the tar ball and
auto(re)conf would have happily integrated it into the next
build.  I suspect that a modification to CMakeLists.txt and
its includes would not have been detected either; even a
daring, but obvious change in the 30000+ lines of source
itself might have gone unnoticed.

A major factor seems to have been the discrepancy between
"the source code" at GitHub & Co. that was probably
scrutinized by many eyes and the shipped, but different
artifact.  So one step (as a inter-distribution effort)
could be to continuously automatically compare shipped
artifacts with their "make dist" equivalents and publishing
the results.

Tim
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to