On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 1:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> Yes. But actually I think Rust is the optimal choice here. Writing
> this in Python would be possibly slightly nicer, but we don't want
> to pull the interpreter and packages into the buildroot. Python
> also has the problem (challenge?) that it needs to be bootstrapped
> once per year. The less packages are involved in the bootstrap, the
> easier it is. And if the brp was written in Python, we'd need to
> deal with that, and it would probably increase the number of builds
> which are done without the cleanup. Having this as an indepedent
> binary avoids some of the issues with bootstrap.

I think Rust *would* be a good choice here ...
BUT add-determinism uses pyo3 to link to CPython, so it pulls in
python3-libs anyway.
So you get the downsides of pulling in Python without the upsides of
using Rust ...

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to