On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 8:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:

> I sometimes think how hard it would be to explain all of this to my
> mother.  I don't understand why 2FA needs to be so obscure and clumsy
> to use.

FIDO2 (Apple branded[0] as "passkeys") is
not that hard to use, or explain.  The problem
is that (a) passkeys are not yet universally
supported (and, in this case specifically, by
FAS[1]), and (b) unlike Apple (macOS, iOS,
etc.), Microsoft (Windows), and Android,
where the passkey is integrated into the
OS inside a protected enclave, there is no
trusted integrated support in Linux without
an external FIDO2 key[2][3] or using the
"scan a QR code" workaround with a
mobile device which does support use of
passkeys.

Unless your mother is using Linux (and
while Mrs. Roberts has been using Linux
for a long time, most moms don't), this is
likely a time limited issue as more and
more sites support passkeys and from
the consumer point of view it all mostly
just works.

I would like to imagine that FAS' current
2FA will eventually also be reasonably
easy with FIDO2/passkeys, which is why
I occasionally ask about the FIDO2
support status.





[0] I don't remember if there was any
official assignment of the branding, but
I heard that Apple was the org that
suggested the name.

[1] As I understand it, if/when some of the
FAS IdP moves to keycloak, FIDO2 2FA
*could* be supported.  However, there is
no current schedule for that move that I
am aware of, and unless Fedora uses the
RHBK runtime, building keycloak from
source for Fedora can be a real PITA
(at least last I looked at it, maybe it has
gotten easier).

[2] As I understand it, the issue is the
lack of the required trusted environment
in generic Linux.  There are software
implementations that do not have the
hardware enclave protections,

[3] External FIDO2 keys are also not free,
although I did see a $10 Adafruit FIDO2
key, which is the cheapest I have seen.
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to