There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports. However, RISC-V recommends to use /usr/lib64/lp64d for the Fedora ABI variant, and various upstream projects follow that.
I think we should follow upstream, so that it's possible to use Fedora to do upstream development without patching the sources, or elaborate Fedora-specific configure invocations. The other reasons is to future-proof the Fedora port against the arrival of an alternative ABI that is not fully backwards-compatible (the same reason why the official RISC-V documentation requires use of these paths). Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
