On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:13 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am aware of a few of the above I'm listed against that my deps no
> longer requre (eg passwd) but I hadn't got around to working out what
> else depended on them to retire without possibly breaking something
> else, overall happy for them to be retired as part of the mass
> retirement if there's no other deps.

Whoops, sorry about that - I constructed  the "packages per
maintainer" list manually, apparently I was too tired to check that
everybody included in the table is also included in the per-maintainer
lists :(

> There's also some that are deps on things still in progress like
> rust-rustls-pki-types (rhbz 2272351 has dep details), not sure how to
> tag those so I don't have to do more work to repackage them.

Thanks for checking!

FYI, rustls-pki-types is no longer a leaf package since I updated
rustls / reqwest to newer versions.

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to