On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 7:16 AM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> * Andrea Bolognani:
>
> > Wouldn't changing -mabi effectively make the result a new Fedora
> > architecture? IIUC, binaries built with -mabi=lp64d wouldn't be able
> > to load libraries built with -mabi=lp64dv and vice versa.
> >
> > If that's correct, then we can't simply have a single "riscv64"
> > architecture: instead, we need to call what we have today
> > riscv64_lp64d, and be ready for riscv64_lp64dv as well as whatever
> > comes next.
>
> Right.
>
> > It would be somewhat similar to existing architectures that can be
> > used in both Little-Endian (ppc64le) and Big-Endian (ppc64) modes.
>
> With different paths, it would be more like i686 and x86_64.  That is,
> you can build and run software for both variants from the same operating
> system image.  That's not the case for ppc64 and ppc64le.
>

As I recall, outside of the x86 family and s390x, all CPU platforms we
support are actually bi-endian and can have applications operate in
either mode. So I'm not sure that's a good example other than nobody
cared to specify parallel install paths for that.

> > This is quite different from just bumping the ISA baseline, where
> > existing binaries and libraries are still usable in the new
> > environment.
>
> Right, changing the vector calling convention may change the size of
> jmp_buf, and then you have a new ABI even if use of the vector features
> is optional.
>

Arguably bumping the baseline should *also* be a new architecture
because it's a total compatibility break.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to