On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:30:23PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:20:07PM +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > > Stephen Gallagher kirjoitti 17.6.2024 klo 23.07: > > > > ===================================== > > > > # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco > > > > ===================================== > > > > > > > > Meeting started by @sgallagh:fedora.im at 2024-06-17 19:00:05 > > > > > > > > Meeting summary > > > > --------------- > > > > * TOPIC: Init Process (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 19:00:31) > > > > * TOPIC: #3222 Change: Make Tuned the Default Power Profile > > > > Management Daemon (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 19:12:35) > > > > * TOPIC: Next week's chair (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 19:50:59) > > > > * ACTION: zbyszek to chair the next meeting (@sgallagh:fedora.im, > > > > 19:53:23) > > > > * TOPIC: Open Floor (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 19:53:30) > > > > * ACTION: @sgallagh to submit a Change to migrate Fedora ELN away > > > > from ODCS (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 20:04:29) > > > > > > > > Meeting ended at 2024-06-17 20:06:17 > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:21 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > = New business = > > > > > > > > > > #3222 Change: Make Tuned the Default Power Profile Management Daemon > > > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3222 > > > > > > This creates the impression that you did not decide anything regarding > > > #3222. Checking from logs, I see that that is not the case: > > > > > > > #agreed FESCo approves the Change to use tuned as the default > > > power-management tool for desktop installs. P-P-D remains in the > > > distribution as an alternative that can be manually installed. (+7, 0, -1) > > > > > > Is the meetbot somehow broken, or was that just wrong syntax or something? > > We forgot to say '!agreed …'. > > I would love for someone to tweak zodbot to use generative AI to > actually make it useful. It served us well for a very long time, but > the published summaries aren't useful for those just wanting to follow > along and the need to remember what was agreed on with implicit > commands is cumbersome. It wouldn't be that hard to just pipe the > logs through an LLM to produce a much better summary and auto-generate > the agreements and decisions. A human would need to review before > sending it out, but I think end consumers would benefit much more.
I think this is one of the rare occasions where we forgot to invoke the right commands. We almost always remember to do that. Sometimes it's useful to edit the summary a bit, I usually do that before sending it out. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
