adamwill wrote: > 2. [KDE live image build > fails](https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/2723244#step/_live_build/49) > because of a file conflict - /usr/bin/fsck.hfs conflicts between hfsutils and > hfsplus-tools
Hi maintainers of hfsutils and hfsplus-tools, This is about the bin-sbin merge (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin). As noticed by AdamW, right now we have /usr/bin/fsck.hfs from hfsutils, and /usr/sbin/fsck.hfs from hfsplus-tools. This worked so some extent before, but when /usr/sbin and /usr/bin become one, the packages are not coinstallable. My proposal: drop /usr/bin/fsck.hfs symlink from hfsutils. It have no opion on which is better, but /usr/sbin is in the default $PATH for root earlier than /usr/bin, so if both are installed, /usr/sbin/fsck.hfs would normally be used. Another option would be to make the packages Conflict, but that wouldn't solve the KDE live image build fail, because it wants to install both packages. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfsutils/pull-request/2 implements my proposal. The problem wasn't noticed before, but now it's blocking the packages rebuilt for the merge from being pushed to rawhide, so we'll need to figure out something quickly. If I don't hear otherwise, I'll merge my PR to unblock things in rawhide. Sorry about the urgency, but this wasn't noticed before and _some_ solution is needed quickly. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
