Dear edition maintainers, what would be the most suitable Emacs for your 
edition?

We build four different GNU Emacs binaries in Fedora.  From newest to oldest:

• emacs-pgtk - “Pure” GTK.  Wayland (and Broadway) native.  Is reportedly 
better on high-DPI screens, but is disrecommended on X11 by upstream, where is 
has some bugs versus the hybrid GTK/X11 build.  Styled via the GTK theme.
• emacs-gtk+x11 - Uses a mixture of GTK and X11 calls, so can only run on 
Wayland via XWayland.  Styled partly via the GTK theme, and partly via X 
resources.
• emacs-lucid - Unlike GTK, the Lucid toolkit can repeatedly connect and 
disconnect from an X11 server, which can be useful when running Emacs remotely. 
 Again, requires XWayland on Wayland.  Styled via X resources.  Looks at bit 
more basic (some might say old-fashioned) compared to the GTK builds.
• emacs-nw - “no window system”.  Terminal only.  Fewer dependecies.

This is potentially pretty confusing for users, so, in Fedora 43, I’ve had a go 
at suggesting suitable default subpackages for when a user does “dnf install 
emacs”:

Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-basic)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-cloud)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-container)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-coreos)
Suggests:      (emacs-gtk+x11 if fedora-release-i3)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-iot)
Suggests:      (emacs-gtk+x11 if fedora-release-matecompiz)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-miraclewm)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-miraclewm-atomic)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-mobility)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-server)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-silverblue)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-sway)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-sway-atomic)
Suggests:      (emacs-nw if fedora-release-toolbx)
Suggests:      (emacs-pgtk if fedora-release-workstation)
Suggests:      (emacs-gtk+x11 if fedora-release-xfce)

People who use or maintain these editions: does the above look reasonable?  
Could anyone fill in the blanks below?

Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-budgie)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-budgie-atomic)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-cinnamon)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-compneuro)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-cosmic)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-cosmic-atomic)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-designsuite)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-kde)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-kde-mobile)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-kinoite)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-kinoite-mobile)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-lxqt)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-soas)
Suggests:      (emacs-??? if fedora-release-wsl)

--
Peter Oliver
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to