On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 09:00:18AM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2026-01-07 08:54, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > I'm compiling a list of common issues found by gcc during the mass > > > prebuild > > > and their resolutions here: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_44_GCC_16_mass_prebuild > > > > > > As before, the full log of results is here: > > > > > > https://github.com/siddhesh/mass-prebuild-logs/blob/main/gcc16-prebuild-report.out > > > > > > The wiki is still work in progress as I walk through the failure list. > > > > FWIW, you've got linux-sgx listed as ignored supposedly due to it failing > > in gcc 15 already but I think that must have been a transient failure. > > Thanks, yes, that's a bug in the auto-classification that my hacked up > script did. I'll fix that up.
But generally, for packages using -Werror, the upstream or downstream must be prepared to deal with new warnings or e.g. new false positives for existing warnings, that is the price to be paid for -Werror ensuring warning free builds. I think in the mass prebuild notes as well as in the future https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-16/porting_to.html we want to mention issues that affect multiple packages or at least is something important to mention for porting; I'd say using regparm attribute on x86_64 is likely not one of those. It should be always ifdefed just to ia32... Jakub -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
