On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 19:43 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 7:40 PM Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Right, that's what I mean. The builds I did don't need to be in rawhide. > > > > But the changes to the specs have still been pushed to dist-git, so > > when those packages are in the mass rebuild, the new versions of the > > packages will get built. > > Yes, but the new versions of the packages (from git) would get built > against the *old* boost (from the rawhide buildroot).
Well, if the boost 1.90.0 bump is still committed to dist-git, boost would get bumped back to 1.90.0 as part of the mass rebuild, which would also be bad. We probably need to commit to *either* fixing the critical deps before the mass rebuild happens and doing the mass rebuild with 1.90.0, *or* reverting the boost soname bump in git to ensure the mass rebuild is done with the old boost, before the mass rebuild starts. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
