On 1/15/26 12:23, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 01. 26 11:50, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
Can please anybody remaind me how is this composed? How the package could end as orhpan, even if it is maintianed (commit at least once per three monhts, but usually more often (including upstream versions updates), and passing all mass
rebuilds ...), and working fine?
I assume this is about openjdk-asmtools, correct?
See https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/2367
The main admin was inactive and was removed, their packages were orphaned
I see. When there is active co-maintainer, maybe the heritage can pass to they?
, you were mentioned.
Right, ty!!
And I immediately took it.
Best regards,
J.
--
Jiri Vanek <[email protected]>
Principal JDK QA engineer
IBM Middleware Czechia s.r.o.
+420 775 39 01 09
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
