Vít Ondruch wrote on 2026/01/23 2:52:
Dne 21. 01. 26 v 19:58 Siddhesh Poyarekar napsal(a):
On 2026-01-20 09:02, Samyak Jain via devel-announce wrote:
Hi all,
Per the Fedora Linux 44 schedule [1], we started a mass rebuild for
Fedora Linux 44 on 2026-01-16, after addressing initial blockers
related to toolchain and dependency changes (including gcc, boost, and
related updates). The Fedora Linux 44 mass rebuild has now concluded
today.
The mass rebuild was run for the changes listed at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_44_Mass_Rebuild#Driving_Features
The rebuild was carried out in a side tag (f44-rebuild) and has been
merged into f44.
Failures from the mass rebuild can be seen at:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f44-failures.html
Packages still needing rebuilding:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f44-need-rebuild.html
A total of 1,566 packages were identified as needing rebuilds as part
of this effort.
At the end of the mass rebuild, 1,242 builds have failed and will need
to be addressed by package maintainers.
In total, 22,016 builds have been successfully tagged into f44.
We also untagged the following builds from f44, as they would
otherwise break Rawhide Compose:
- authselect-1.7.0-3.fc44
- shadow-utils-4.19.0-4.fc44
- firefox-147.0-2.fc44
- net-snmp-5.9.5.2-3.fc44
FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly for the remaining failures.
Please note that we have identified some common types of failures that we
noticed during gcc distribution testing before the mass rebuild[1] to help
packagers fix failures caused by these issues.
Sid
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_44_GCC_16_mass_prebuild
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ruby
A suspect that this one is also related to GCC. Could somebody investigate?
Rather, looks like the fault of binutils-2.45.50-19.fc44.aarch64.
Actually linkage (ld.bfd) is failing only on aarch64, with the message:
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: jit.o: warning: relocation against `rb_jit_reserve_addr_space'
in read-only section `.rodata'
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: error: read-only segment has dynamic relocations
(the above is when disabling lto)
Downloading binutils-2.45.50-9.fc44.aarch64 makes the above successful (i.e. no
error).
Will try bisecting.
And looking at jit.s, I don't understand why ld.bfd says
rb_jit_reserve_addr_space is in .rodata.
Regards,
Mamoru
Thanks
Vít
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
