Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Bill Nottingham <nott...@redhat.com> wrote: > > (Attempting to CC relevant spins/groups maintainers) > > > > I'm looking to do some rework of the base-x comps group. Right now, its > > main purpose in life is to provide the X server that is used by the > > various desktops (and the window-managers group, I suppose). However, given > > that, it has stuff in it that it really shouldn't - configuration tools, > > applets, session services, and so on. > > > > Attached is a patch series that attempts to remove this cruft from the > > base-x group, and place it, where relevant, in the appropriate desktop > > groups. (At least, the cruft that was on by default - I haven't attempted > > to weed out the optional packages yet.) > > > > Does this look sane, as far as it touches your particular desktop? In many > > cases, these tools/apps were getting removed/disabled by the live spins > > anyway. > > Looks sane from the Sugar/MeeGo side of things, and is very much > appreciated as its been on my todo list for a long time.
I knew I was going to forget a spin on the CC list, sorry about that. Thanks for the review! Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
