On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 23:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv > > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists > > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A > > but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is > > unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be > > done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to > > say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational > > reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance? > > Yes. It's where to put non-transient service data that does not belong to a > user, and does not belong to a package. >
+1 - I think /srv is a good dir to have in place to encourage good practices for storing that kind of data. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
