Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647 > > > > I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In > > my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my > > upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out. > > > > Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which > > default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default > > there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base. > > admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really > > an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin > > activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base. > > > > Thoughts? > > Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on network > and other slower file systems esp if its used for home directories. It > certainly shouldn't be in base.
Moving it to default in @system-tools seems fine to me as a first step. However, that's not in the 'default' install (but it would place it on the install media.) If it's wanted in the default install, the @base group is the best place for it (it doesn't belong in @core.) >From a size perspective, it's not a huge deal - 500k with no deps that aren't already in @core. From a functionality perspective, it would be good to fix the issues it has with disconnected machines, etc. - I've always removed it personally because the times where it would annoy me would always weigh higher than the times where it helped. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
