On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:16:45PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 13.06.11 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir? > > > > > > I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library directory. > > > > But it isn't a library directory. It's a directory for arch-depndendant > > stuff, which includes (but is not limited to) libraries. > > It's a directory for arch-dependent stuff that should only exist once on > a system, whereas lib is for arch-dependent stuff that may exist for > multiple architectures on one system. I have no opinion on whether that > distinction is important. > <nod> See the thread I linked to previously for people working out the nuances and reasons behind that.
-Toshio
pgpcsGOz4p2gB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
