On Tue, 19.07.11 03:43, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lennart Poettering > <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote: > > On Mon, 18.07.11 23:26, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote: > >> I can't see a reason to discuss /etc/sysconfig as a single unit, nor > >> to argue for removal of /etc/sysconfig a single unit, nor to try to > >> form a definite consensus about /etc/sysconfig. > > > > Oh, it definitely can be discussed as single unit. Check the Fedora > > packaging guidelines: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript > <snip> > > >> * _various_ software: Each file needs to be discussed separately, in > >> the context of the software that uses it. > >> /etc/sysconfig/{crond,iptables,nspluginwrapper} have nothing in > >> common, and need to be considered separately together with the > >> software that uses these files. > > > > Nah, not true. The packaging guidelines say explicitly what you should > > place in that directory. > They only say that SysV scripts should be placed in that directory, > not that SysV files are the only, or primary, content. I have already > provided a counterexample above.
As I already made clear in the original blog story: they aren't the only but they are the main contents of the directory. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
