Am 21.07.2011 23:03, schrieb Jeff Spaleta: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Karel Zak <k...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> because >>> really that is exactly what you want to do on your system. If our >>> mount command will still attempt to write to /etc/mtab once its a real >>> file again, maybe things will work for you as expected. >> >> No. systemd is not compatible with /etc/mtab > > To be clear, you are saying that systemd won't be updating /etc/mtab > like the mount command tries to do? > > If so, I believe a sufficiently motivated admin would be able to > figure out a way to manually update /etc/mtab from /proc/mounts if > they wanted to see systemd mounted items in their site specific mtab > they are trying to maintain
about what are you speaking? in /proc/mounts is no hint what are bind-mounts and what real devcies this is the root of the hwole evil and why F15 is borked for anything which will useful DISPLAY mounted devcies / df and so on where did i say that i want maintain anything? i want not see bind-mounts in df / mount output and no warnings if a call "df" as normal user while named is running not more and not less
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
