On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:02:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> I've mentioned before that I actually support this, but I'm in the >> minority, and AFAIK the current policy is supposed to be that >> maintainers cannot upkarma updates they submitted themselves. However, >> this seems to be happening - exhibit a): >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc16 >> >> karma is listed as 1, the only positive feedback shown as I write this >> is from kengert, who submitted the update. >> >> Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / >> case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to > nudge a package into stable. > > e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15 > even with my +1 still not there, and this isn't the only package I've done > this for.
Do you mean if you don't want to wait for a week in testing? Or is you're package not aging out for some reason? I own several (new) packages that are not really used yet (building blocks for other packages) and I didn't feel right about +1 my own packages so I just end up leaving them in testing until they can be pushed to stable... Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
