Once upon a time, Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> said: > Any opinions on which way to jump?
How hard is it to fix source that accesses the fields directly? Do all the fields that were previously exposed have direct accessor functions? If that's the case, it should be straight-forward (although time consuming) grunt work to get the necessary packages fixed (maybe some of it can even be scripted?). If you can give a basic "replace info.foo with foo(info)" type script, it shouldn't be too hard to get enough help to roll through it (I'd be willing if you can tell me what to do; I've never used libpng directly myself, so I'm not familiar with what is required). Since all the packages that depend on libpng would have to be rebuilt twice if you don't go to the latest version now, I'd say go ahead and get it over with once (i.e. go to 1.5). -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
