On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2012-01-11, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 1. If installing icons into in to /usr/share/pixmaps is indeed >> deprecated. Then we need to update the packaging guidelines for the >> Desktop Files section[2]. In the "Icon tag in Desktop Files" section >> it explicitly shows a full path to an icon file in /usr/share/pixmaps. >> While not intended as a guideline, it should be revised to showing a >> full path to an icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor (probably in the >> 48x48 directory since it's the minimum requirement[3].) >> > This would forbid desktop environment to pick up more appropriate format > (e.g. SVG) and made other icon variants useless just vasting a space.
I'm not sure I understand what your saying. A 48x48 icon is already a minimum requirement, regardless of my proposal. But I don't see how anything I proposed makes any other icon sizes useless. I already mentioned that the update I'm proposing here isn't a binding guideline, but to update the example from /usr/share/pixmaps to /usr/share/icons. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
