On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, 7:15:13 PM, Reindl wrote: > Am 16.02.2012 00:48, schrieb Al Dunsmuir: >> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, 6:12:44 PM, Reindl wrote: >>> this will not work since if a systemd-unit is present >>> systemd no longer is interested in anything from >>> /etc/init.d/ >> >>> so there is no solution except patch systemd if iptables.service is >>> called which will not happen because it would be unmaintainable >>> ober the long and doing it for iptables would bring a lot of >>> of other people complaining "but why not XXX whateverservice" too >> >> Johann has spent some significant time contributing to the last two >> Fedora releases, specifically a great deal of the actual conversion to >> systemd init. >> >> I'm sure that he and others can get something functioning rather >> quickly by working _with_ the systemd developers. Even better, my >> experience is that both Johann and Lennart are fully capable of coming >> up these answers without filling everyone's days with bile and crass >> negativity. >> >> Why not let them have a chance, instead of insisting on using every >> opportunity to attempt to advance your own twisted viewpoint?
> what is your exactly problem here? > well, wait their replies that they will not include all > sorts of exceptions for random services in systemd because > their target is holding systemd clean and compact to prvent > the need of the next init-system switch in few years Q.E.D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
