On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:56:59AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > <needless-rant-please-ignore> > It's very unfortunate that this high standard of requirements for > disruptive changes in Fedora wasn't properly applied to some of the > recent disruptive changes. Particularly the very recent unnamed > disruptive change in Fedora 17. > </needless-rant-please-ignore>
The owners of that feature convinced the appropriate governing body that it would benefit the distribution, took responsibility for making it happen and have been working through the technical issues that arose. It's exactly the same set of requirements as would apply to a switch to llvm. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
