Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient than searching the mail address in the FAS database.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jamie Nguyen <ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk>wrote: > Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen <ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Thomas Spura wrote: > >>> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com>: > >>>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email > and FAS > >>>> account. > >>>> How do you do this check? > >>> > >>> Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail > >>> address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4]. > >>> When it's not there either, the user has not signed cla yet and cannot > >>> be a packager, yet. > >> > >> You can't be a packager without signing the CLA, but you can sign the > >> CLA without being a packager. > > > > Yes, no cla -> no packager, like I wrote above. > > When someone has signed the cla, you then need to look if the user is > > already member of the packager group... > > Perhaps I misunderstand, but I think the real problem is that the > email used for bugzilla doesn't have to be the same as the email > specified when signing up for a FAS account. So if the bugzilla email > isn't found in FAS, it doesn't necessarily mean that they don't yet > have a FAS account. Similarly, it also doesn't necessarily mean that > they haven't signed the CLA yet. > > I don't know how these queries are done, but I would have thought that > if you can query whether any members of the CLA group have the email > address in question, you might as well query the Packager group from > the start. > > > Jamie > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel