On 02/27/2012 02:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:07 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 27.02.2012 04:21:
#topic #810 Clarify our position on forks .fesco 810
It's just a statement that is asked for in the ticket, but nevertheless:
Shouldn't issues like this be discussed on this list first, so FESCo
members can get a impression from the flamewar ^w discussion what the
developer community thinks about the issue raised?
Personally, my stance on this is that, provided that the forks are
properly renamed such that they will not conflict with other forks of
the same codebase, there's no reason to disallow them.
ACK. The fact "forks are forks" or even more general the "origin of a
package" should be irrelevant. They should be treated like any other
arbitrary package.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
