-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/27/2012 03:19 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> I think "removing the legacy cruft" just for the goal of removing it is not >> helpful at all and is actually the main cause of "half baked", "half >> removed" stuff in Fedora. > > Interesting how did you come to that conclusion? > >> >> I assume that that mod_access_compat module only requires a few bytes, so I >> don't see why it should not be loaded by default forever (or at least as >> long as upstream supports it, which hopefully will be for the whole 2.4 >> cycle). > > Few bytes for mod_access_compat here, few bytes for something else there.... > >> >> Of course, web app packages in Fedora itself SHOULD be updated to the new >> directives, but that's not a reason to gratuitously break the old ones. > > It's my experience that things dont seem to get fixed unless they are broken > and what "compat" does is just delaying the inevitable... > > Those web app maintainers that actually bother to monitor upstream have > already made the necessary changes to their relevant component and did so as > soon as 2.4 got release and probably are just waiting until we start shipping > 2.4. > > It's those that dont and they will drag their feets in doing so until that > compatibility is removed... > > JBG
Joe, I am not sure how this effects SELinux labeling, if it does at all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9zCnIACgkQrlYvE4MpobO+TwCg5vmaymeSPFTnGYMuhcPGsaOG G0IAnRWrJ1zyyn6lvffkb1kzbb2UdCGu =VNnY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
